Photos, messages, reactions, comments and other activity.
Social media privacy should be designed in.
Most social platforms make privacy a settings problem. A different architecture can make identity, data and permissions part of the system itself.
What is actually being collected?
Social apps can observe much more than the content you intentionally publish. Activity, relationships, device information and interaction patterns can become part of a larger behavioral profile.
Relationships, frequency of interaction and network patterns.
Searches, viewing patterns, clicks and engagement signals.
Device details, permissions and contextual location information.
Privacy improvements you can make today.
Settings can reduce unnecessary exposure. They are useful, even though they do not change the underlying platform model.
Turn off ad personalization
Review advertising settings across your social accounts and connected services.
Reduce app permissions
Review location, contacts, microphone and other permissions and keep only what the application genuinely needs.
Audit old posts
Revisit old content and visibility settings instead of assuming yesterday's defaults still reflect your preferences.
Download your data
A data export can reveal how much information a platform associates with your account.
Limit cross-site login
Be deliberate about using a social account as an identity provider on unrelated services.
Choose the architecture carefully
Long-term privacy depends not only on settings, but on where identity and data live in the first place.
What changes when identity and data are separate?
A privacy-first social media model can give people more control over identity, sharing, and data ownership instead of treating personal information as platform property.
Web5-oriented systems use decentralized identity and data infrastructure to change the relationship between people, applications and records.
Settings vs. architecture
MILAN
Privacy is a product decision.
A no ads social network and no tracking social network can reduce commercial pressure around personal data while giving people clearer privacy choices.
MILAN is built as a privacy-first decentralized social network around DID and DWN concepts. The product direction is to make identity, data and sharing part of the architecture rather than treating privacy as a settings screen alone.
Before you trust a social platform, ask:
Social media privacy questions
How do social media apps track you?
Platforms can collect information about posts, interactions, searches, device context, permissions and relationship patterns. The exact data varies by service.
Can privacy settings completely stop tracking?
Settings can reduce collection or exposure, but they do not necessarily change the underlying data architecture of a service.
What is the role of a DWN in privacy?
A DWN can provide a decentralized data layer in which records and access are handled according to the architecture and permission model of the application.
What is a DID?
A DID is a Decentralized Identifier used as part of decentralized identity systems.
Is decentralized social media automatically private?
No. Decentralization and privacy are related but different properties. A decentralized system still needs appropriate identity, permissions, storage and application design.
Why does architecture matter?
Architecture determines how identity, data and permissions relate to the application. Privacy controls are only one layer of that larger design.
See a different approach to social networking.
Explore the ideas behind MILAN and the architecture behind them.